![]() Pharma 101 - Pharmaceutical Fraud |
||||||||||
Archive for the 'Off-Label' CategoryFDA Issues a draft Guidance for Dissemination of Information on Unapproved Uses of Medical ProductsThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last Friday issued a draft guidance on “Good Reprint Practices” for regarding the distribution of medical or scientific journal articles and reference publications that involve unapproved uses of FDA-approved drugs and medical devices. Draft guidances are often put into final form with substantially the same wording. “Articles that discuss unapproved uses of FDA-approved drugs and devices can contribute to the practice of medicine and may even constitute a medically recognized standard of care,” said Randall Lutter, FDA deputy commissioner for policy. “This guidance also safeguards against off-label promotion.” Previously, Section 401 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act set out guidelines that allowed the dissemination of information on unapproved uses of FDA-approved products. As long as the guidelines were met by the manufacturers, the dissemination of such materials was not viewed by the FDA as evidence of an intent to promote the product for an “off-label” use. However, Section 401 expired on Sept. 30, 2006. The FDA’s “Good Reprint Practices” draft guidance recommends principles manufacturers should follow when they distribute scientific or medical journal reprints, articles, or reference publications. Publications that the medical community rely on should be independent. Accordingly, some of the principles include ensuring that the article or reference be published by an organization that has an editorial board. The organization also should fully disclose any conflicts of interest or biases for all authors, contributors or editors associated with the journal article. Articles should be peer-reviewed and published in accordance with specific procedures. Not surprisingly, the draft guidance also recommends against distribution of special supplements or publications that have been funded by one or more of the manufacturers of the product in the article, and further, (stating the obvious), that articles that are not supported by credible medical evidence are considered false and misleading and should not be distributed. FDA, Good Reprint Practices, off label, Pharmaceutical, unapproved uses
Purdue Pharma Agrees to $19.5 Million Settlement Over Off Label Marketing of OxyContinPurdue Pharma has agreed to settle claims by 26 states and the District of Columbia for marketing and promoting OxyContin for unapproved uses i.e. for use every 8 hours as opposed to the FDA approved dosage of every 12 hours. The states alleged that FDA rules were violated by Purdue promoting OxyContin as the painkiller “to start with and the one to stay with” for numerous kinds of pain even though the drug was specifically approved a more limited use in patients who need long-term pain management. Further, the states contend that Purdue paid its sales force based on how much physicians prescribed OxyContin which led to the “misuse, diversion and abuse” of OxyContin according to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Pursuant to the $19.5 million settlement, Purdue must immediately stop its off-label marketing and heed the warning label contained on its packaging.
To read more click here or more about pharmaceutical fraud at Nolan & Auerbach.
|
||||||||||
|
Regulatory Documents (PDF)
Nolan Law Firm Articles |
|
|||||||||
Site Sponsored By:
|
Nolan & Auerbach, P.A. is a qui tam law firm whose practice is uniquely limited to healthcare fraud cases under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. We know healthcare fraud because that's what we do! Toll free: 800-FRAUD 04 |
|||||||||
"The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based |
Licensed in Florida |
|||||||||